Psychologist Philip Zimbardo says happiness and success are rooted in a trait most of us disregard: the way we orient toward the past, present and future. He suggests we calibrate our outlook on time as a first step to improving our lives.
He says there are six time perspectives (TP):
- Past TP - Focus on Positives
- Past TP - Focus on Negatives
- Present TP - Hedonism (joys of life)
- Present TP - Fatalism (doesn't matter, your life is controlled)
- Future TP - Life Goal-Oriented
- Future TP - Transcendental ~ Life after death of the mortal body
He says the optimal approach is to have enough personal awareness that you can allow one perspective to take precedence while the others recede depending on the situation. The optimal mix is:
- Past Positive: High
- Future: Moderately High
- Present-Hedonism: Moderate
- Past Negative: Low
- Present-Fatalism: Low
The past positive gives you roots - to connect to your identity and family - to be grounded. The future gives you wings - to soar to new destinations and challenges. Present Hedonism gives you energy - to explore people, places, self, and sensuality
Any leader should be able think about past organizations and place coworkers into one of the time perspectives. If you've ever studied Jung or the Myers-Briggs type indicators, I think these fit in pretty nicely with the model too. I can see those with a preference for sensing to more likely connect with a past time perspective while someone with a preference for intuition would be more aligned with a future time perspective.
As you think about your senior leadership team, this is another way to consider how diversity of perspective is impacting your ability to move your organization forward. Doesn't mean you have to go recruit a bunch of people with different perspectives but rather that you conduct scenario planning and have frank, everything-in-the-open discussions (with designated devil's advocates if necessary) to ensure that your perspectives are balanced for your organization. In addition, these time perspectives and the associated stories people tell and use to create assumptions / filters will have a huge impact on your change management efforts. Is one of your functions more past time oriented? Why? Do you need everyone to be future oriented? Why?
In MBTI, the suggested approach for group idea generating and plan creating is:
Any leader should be able think about past organizations and place coworkers into one of the time perspectives. If you've ever studied Jung or the Myers-Briggs type indicators, I think these fit in pretty nicely with the model too. I can see those with a preference for sensing to more likely connect with a past time perspective while someone with a preference for intuition would be more aligned with a future time perspective.
As you think about your senior leadership team, this is another way to consider how diversity of perspective is impacting your ability to move your organization forward. Doesn't mean you have to go recruit a bunch of people with different perspectives but rather that you conduct scenario planning and have frank, everything-in-the-open discussions (with designated devil's advocates if necessary) to ensure that your perspectives are balanced for your organization. In addition, these time perspectives and the associated stories people tell and use to create assumptions / filters will have a huge impact on your change management efforts. Is one of your functions more past time oriented? Why? Do you need everyone to be future oriented? Why?
In MBTI, the suggested approach for group idea generating and plan creating is:
- Start with Sensing: facts, data, past experiences
- Move to Intuition: connecting different themes, seemingly unrelated points of data and conclusions, and using them to draw new ideas out and to boldly predict the future
- Leverage Thinking: Deploy logic and be methodical in your analysis, putting past experiences and future scenarios through your new framework or approach; find holes in your thinking, iterate, question, etc.
- Finish with Feeling: Ask yourself if this new approach is exciting to you, does it draw you to want to deal with the change effort required to achieve it? How do you think others will respond to the idea? What might be their concerns, needs, desires, additions, etc?

0 comments:
Post a Comment